scientology-reviews-logo

NOTICE: This non-commercial website is NOT affiliated with the Church of Scientology (link).

homeWHERE TO GET HELP: There are now two avenues for Scientology services. Find out what to expect and what...

Most Reviewed Programs

Most Helpful Program Reviews

 
1.0
Reviewed by constant vigilance
"The GAT (Golden Age of Tech) invalidated auditors who were..."
 
1.0
Reviewed by Thoughtful
"In 2008 a friend who was at the Int base..."
 
1.0
Reviewed by Izhar
"This was the worst criminal activity one could expect in..."
 
1.0
Reviewed by Martin Padfield
"For all the pros and cons, the fact is the..."
 
1.0
Reviewed by Maurice
"The six month check for individuals on OT7 is a..."
 
1.0
Reviewed by constant vigilance
"My comments are as stated above. Disconnection done by..."
 
5.0
Reviewed by constant vigilance
"I have been invalidated and brow beat and crushed many..."
 
2.5
Reviewed by scientology2.0
"GAT was supposed to bring auditor training to a whole..."
 
1.5
Reviewed by Paul Adams
"At the end of 2007 I did a word-by-word, page-by-page..."
 
1.0
Reviewed by eagle
"People associate with each other, and decide to disassociate at..."

Review Detail

 
David Miscavige Programs
November 04, 2012    
Very ambivalent about the Basics. On the one hand, having the full sequential set of books and lectures is really great for a purely theoretical study of the subject. This does not make auditors, however, but it is interesting. On the other hand, finding out that there were several alterations and key omissions, is very disappointing. (A good example of this is in the Phildelphia Doctorate Course lectures, where Hubbard spoke of a world without a remedy for Scientology being worse than Orwell's "1984" - which has been omitted from the 2007 Basics version, and thus the point Hubbard was making is lost, if you do not know what he originally said). Speaking to old timers who still possess the original L. Ron Hubbard books and lectures, one has a sense of loss of authenticity, and thus not a true study of the subject.
Overall rating 
 
3.0
Needed 
 
3.0
Helpful 
 
3.0
Reviewed by eagle November 11, 2012
Top 10 Reviewer  -   View all my reviews (23)

Alterations

Very ambivalent about the Basics. On the one hand, having the full sequential set of books and lectures is really great for a purely theoretical study of the subject. This does not make auditors, however, but it is interesting. On the other hand, finding out that there were several alterations and key omissions, is very disappointing. (A good example of this is in the Phildelphia Doctorate Course lectures, where Hubbard spoke of a world without a remedy for Scientology being worse than Orwell's "1984" - which has been omitted from the 2007 Basics version, and thus the point Hubbard was making is lost, if you do not know what he originally said). Speaking to old timers who still possess the original L. Ron Hubbard books and lectures, one has a sense of loss of authenticity, and thus not a true study of the subject.

Where I stand on key issues

I am a
ex-Scientologist

Pros and Cons (optional)

Pros
It is nice to have it all in sequence, and it is nice to be able to study the subject in a sequential manner to get a theoretical overview.
Cons
Alterations, dammit! Very disappointed that there were alterations and omissions, so one does not have the somplete original work by L. Ron Hubbard, but a synthesized version of it.
Was this review helpful to you? 

Comments

Already have an account? or Create an account
Powered by JReviews