New Era Dianetics Hot

Having previously trained on Standard Dianetics, I can appreciate how NED is streamlined from earlier forms of R3R, how it runs deeper, handles the pc's dianetics case as what the thetan is doing to the body, and gets results faster.

I had some NED auditing years after going Clear. Even so, I had some gain on narrative incidents althought I soon realised I was only running them as straightwire recalls. This may be the reason why NED lead to the discovery of so many Dianetic Clears: on Standard Dianetics they could grind away, dutifully putting the bank back and kidding themselves they were running it out. But NED invites the thetan to wake up and look.

Read Dianetics Modern Science of Mental health then look for a professional auditor or co-auditor outside corporate Scientology. You have been warned! The last thing corporate Scientology cares about these days (it was different in the past) is helping anybody except for themselves.

I did the NED course around 1980, as my first real auditor training course. At the time, NED was delivered before the grades. It sounded quite miraculous in what it could handle. Now, not so much, as there are auditing actions that cover the ground much better. For example, when one is thrust into some charged topic or incident, one's attention will go to some part of that topic or incident. It might be at the beginning, the middle or the end. Trying to running the incident starting at the beginning and going through to the end violates the principle of auditing what the pc's attention is on.

Then, usually while that incident is still charged, one is supposed to go diving out of present time looking for some usually-wispy earlier-similar. If one audits the pc in present time (as one should), one will try and discharge that first incident wholly by itself, and any important earlier-similar (or later-similar) will come to the fore and eventually one has no choice in the matter as the original incident will no longer be visible but the other incident will be very visible. That is the time to audit the second incident.

There's more, but you've probably got the point by now that I am not too impressed with NED auditing. Still, if it is all you believe in and all your auditor delivers, then go for it. :)

In its defence, NED is vastly better than the 1969 Standard Dianetics it replaced. I received hundreds of hours of that, with at least three drug rundowns, including a "Whole Track Drug Rundown." Ah, the good old days. :)