scientology-reviews-logo

NOTICE: This non-commercial website is NOT affiliated with the Church of Scientology (link).

homeWHERE TO GET HELP: There are now two avenues for Scientology services. Find out what to expect and what...
Training Services Primary Rundown (for super literacy)

Primary Rundown (for super literacy) Hot

October 15, 2012    
 
2.9 (2)
1668   0   0   0   0   0
Write Review

The result of the Primary Rundown is super literacy. For some strange reason, the Church of Scientology stopped delivering this service but it is available in the Independent Scientology field.

User reviews

Average user rating from: 2 user(s)

Overall rating 
 
2.9
Makes life easier 
 
3.5  (2)
Worth the investment 
 
3.5  (2)
Easy to do 
 
1.0  (2)
Usefulness of information 
 
3.5  (2)
Already have an account? or Create an account
I must admit that I only signed up for this course in 1973 because it was a per-requisite for my next major course, which was Academy levels. Anyway, I started the course at CC LA in late 1972, continued it at the Flag Ship Apollo in 1973 and finished it in late 1973 at AOSHEU in Copenhagen, Denmark. Most of the time, I was doing the course part time, but it took more than 1 year.

In the past 40 years I have used this Study technology to study many, many new subjects. If there was only one course I could pick to use in a lifetime, it would be this course. With it you can go anywhere in life. With or without Scientology. It gives you the ability to understand anything and be a success at anything in life simply because you can study, understand and apply the most complex subject....
Overall rating 
 
4.0
Makes life easier 
 
5.0
Worth the investment 
 
5.0
Easy to do 
 
1.0
Usefulness of information 
 
5.0
Reviewed by Robert Almblad November 10, 2012
Top 10 Reviewer  -   View all my reviews (19)

Best education you can get

I must admit that I only signed up for this course in 1973 because it was a per-requisite for my next major course, which was Academy levels. Anyway, I started the course at CC LA in late 1972, continued it at the Flag Ship Apollo in 1973 and finished it in late 1973 at AOSHEU in Copenhagen, Denmark. Most of the time, I was doing the course part time, but it took more than 1 year.

In the past 40 years I have used this Study technology to study many, many new subjects. If there was only one course I could pick to use in a lifetime, it would be this course. With it you can go anywhere in life. With or without Scientology. It gives you the ability to understand anything and be a success at anything in life simply because you can study, understand and apply the most complex subject....

Where I stand

I am a...
Independent Scientologist

Pros and Cons (optional)

Pros
You can study and understand any subject when you are finished with the course....
Cons
When you take this course, most of the time you are studying the definitions of words and sometimes the English language instead of LRH technology. Also, it can be a long course depending on your command of the English language in the first place.

Bottom line...

Recommend it to a friend?
Yes
Was this review helpful to you? 
This huge course used to be studied solo, then in the late-80s some idiot in the CofS made it a twinned action. I sup'd a couple of students through it at ITO (solo, not twinned) in 1987, and it took them literally three months full time. I can't imagine how lengthy it would be to do it twinned. I think that if one is going to do such a course, looking up all the definitions of a few thousand words, it would be more practical to take something like the "Oxford 3000" list of words selected by vocabulary experts and teachers for their importance and usefulness rather than the words randomly used by Hubbard in the Study Tapes.
Overall rating 
 
1.8
Makes life easier 
 
2.0
Worth the investment 
 
2.0
Easy to do 
 
1.0
Usefulness of information 
 
2.0
Reviewed by Paul Adams November 10, 2012
#1 Reviewer  -   View all my reviews (47)

Using the Oxford 3000 word list might be better

This huge course used to be studied solo, then in the late-80s some idiot in the CofS made it a twinned action. I sup'd a couple of students through it at ITO (solo, not twinned) in 1987, and it took them literally three months full time. I can't imagine how lengthy it would be to do it twinned. I think that if one is going to do such a course, looking up all the definitions of a few thousand words, it would be more practical to take something like the "Oxford 3000" list of words selected by vocabulary experts and teachers for their importance and usefulness rather than the words randomly used by Hubbard in the Study Tapes.

Where I stand

I am a...
ex-Scientologist

Pros and Cons (optional)

Cons
Very lengthy to do, and arguably the time could be better spent on other things.

Bottom line...

Recommend it to a friend?
No
Was this review helpful to you? 
 
Powered by JReviews